Electronic Performance Monitoring
It is now possible for organizations to monitor employees in many ways, but this practice can also have unintended and negative effects. We are currently investigating how electronic monitoring affects employee well-being and behavior.
Ravid, D. M., White, J. C., Tomczak, D. L., Miles, A. F., & Behrend, T. S. (2023). A meta‐analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 5-40.
White, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2023). Workplace surveillance shapes worker experiences. In D. L. Blustein & L. Y. Flores (Eds). Rethinking work: Essays on building a better workplace. Routledge.
Ravid, D. M., Pitcher, B. D., Alge, B. J., & Behrend, T. S. (2022). Body-worn camera technologies can promote positive policing. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 612-616.
Pitcher, B. D., Miles, A. F., Mancarella, P. J., & Behrend, T. S. (2022). Socioeconomic and job status differences in the experience of perceived unacceptable electronic performance monitoring. Technology, Mind, and Behavior.
Ravid, D. M., Tomczak, D. L., White, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2021). An incubator for electronic performance monitoring and work privacy research. Research incubator held at the 36th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (Virtual Conference).
Ravid, D. M., Tomczak, D. L., White, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2020). EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. Journal of Management.
White, J. C., Ravid, D. M., & Behrend, T. S. (2020). Moderating effects of person and job characteristics on digital monitoring outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology.
Brown Yost, A., Behrend, T. S., Howardson, G., Badger Darrow, J., D., & Jensen, J. M. (2018). Reactance to electronic surveillance: A test of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 1-16.
Willford, J. C., Tomczak, D. L., Jimenez, W., Ravid, D., & Behrend, T. S. (2017, April). Electronic performance monitoring type predicts monitoring perceptions and contextual performance. Poster presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
Willford, J.C., Cox, M.J., Howard, R.H., & Behrend, TS. (2015, May). Workplace monitoring and surveillance: A mixed-methods examination of invasiveness perceptions. Poster presented at the 28th annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, New York, NY.
Willford, J. C., Howard, R. H., Cox, M. J., Badger, J. M., & Behrend, T. S. (2015, April). A latent class analysis of electronic performance monitoring practices. Poster presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.
Karim, M. N., Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology (special issue on Inductive Research), 29, 555-572. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z
Brown, A. R., Badger, J. M., Behrend, T. S., & Jensen, J. M. (2012, April). Personality predicts acceptance of performance monitoring at work. Poster presented to the 27th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
